Skip to content

Update devise: 4.7.2 → 4.7.3 (patch)#321

Closed
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
depfu/update/devise-4.7.3
Closed

Update devise: 4.7.2 → 4.7.3 (patch)#321
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
depfu/update/devise-4.7.3

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Sep 22, 2020

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ devise (4.7.2 → 4.7.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

4.7.3 (from changelog)

  • bug fixes
    • Do not modify :except option given to #serializable_hash. (by @dpep)
    • Fix thor deprecation when running the devise generator. (by @deivid-rodriguez)
    • Fix hanging tests for streaming controllers using Devise. (by @afn)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 28 commits:

↗️ bcrypt (indirect, 3.1.13 → 3.1.16) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.1.16 (from changelog)

  - Fix compilation on FreeBSD. [GH #234]

3.1.15 (from changelog)

  - Remove GVL optimization.  Apparently it breaks things [GH #230]

3.1.14 (from changelog)

  - Start calibration from the minimum cost supported by the algorithm [GH #206 by @sergey-alekseev]

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 35 commits:

↗️ loofah (indirect, 2.6.0 → 2.7.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.7.0

2.7.0 / 2020-08-26

Features

  • Allow CSS properties page-break-before, page-break-inside, and page-break-after. [#190] (Thanks, @ahorek!)

Fixes

  • Don't drop the !important rule from some CSS properties. [#191] (Thanks, @b7kich!)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 9 commits:

↗️ minitest (indirect, 5.14.1 → 5.14.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.14.2 (from changelog)

  • 1 bug fix:

    • Bumped ruby version to include 3.0 (trunk).

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:

↗️ warden (indirect, 1.2.8 → 1.2.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.2.9 (from changelog)

  • Avoid warning on uninitialized instance variable (#188)
  • Bump rack to 2.2.3 (#190)
  • Remove Gemfile.lock
  • Resolve outstanding TODO entries (#179)
  • A bunch of gem structure cleanup (thanks @olleolleolle)
  • Set winning strategy when :warden is thrown (#174)
  • Bump rack dependency to >= 2.0.9 due to CVEs

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 36 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Sep 22, 2020
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Dec 17, 2021

Closed in favor of #366.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Dec 17, 2021
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/devise-4.7.3 branch December 17, 2021 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants